Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-4
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Released February 2012
- Previous Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Updated by Canon SX260 HS
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Canon SX240 HS versus Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX240 HS was brought out 4 years before the TG-4 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SX240 HS matches up against the TG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus TG-4
| SX240 HS | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Canon SX240 HS
| TG-4 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | February 2012 | Fresher by 38 months |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-4
| SX240 HS | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX240 HS features external dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX240 HS versus Olympus TG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the SX240 HS and the TG-4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and TG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX240 HS and TG-4.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to give you extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older SX240 HS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
includes face detect autofocus
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
exports RAW files
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX240 HS
Street photography with Olympus TG-4
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (224 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (247g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography information
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography information
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
slow frames per second (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery life (230 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
better than average battery power (380 shots)
max frames per second very slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition in class (224 grams)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
missing Timelapse function
low battery life (230 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery power (380 shots)
environment sealing
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competition (247 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
low battery life (230 shots)
missing Timelapse function
manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
better than average battery power (380 CIPA)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Vlogging camera
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (224g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
missing microphone socket
rather wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition (247 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | 380 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $379 |