Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-5
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched February 2012
- Replaced the Canon SX230 HS
- Successor is Canon SX260 HS
Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2017
- Old Model is Olympus TG-4
- Successor is Olympus TG-6
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-5, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the TG-5 (12MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX240 HS was introduced 6 years prior to the TG-5 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SX240 HS grades versus the TG-5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus TG-5
| SX240 HS | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Canon SX240 HS
| TG-5 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 64 months |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-5
| SX240 HS | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX240 HS provides outer dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the SX240 HS versus the TG-5.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX240 HS and TG-5 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The picture below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX240 HS and TG-5.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of images but you might want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged SX240 HS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-5 Portrait photography advice
manual focus
features face detect focusing
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
you can focus manually
includes face detect focus
exports RAW formats
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-5 Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (224 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (250 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography info
Olympus TG-5 Sports photography info
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking focus
slow fps (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (230 shots)
does not have phase detect AF
high frames per second (20.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
good battery power (340 per charge)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-5 Travel photography highlights
lighter than competition in class (224 grams)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery pack (230 per charge)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
good battery power (340 shots)
environment proof
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition (250g)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX240 HS
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-5
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
terrible battery pack (230 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
good battery power (340 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-5 as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (224 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
reasonably wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no microphone jack
more heavy than competition (250 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2017-05-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 20.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lb) | 250 gr (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | 340 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $449 |