Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus VR-320
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Superseded the Canon SX230 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX260 HS
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX240 HS was introduced 7 months later than the VR-320 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the SX240 HS scores versus the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus VR-320
| SX240 HS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon SX240 HS
| VR-320 | SX240 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus VR-320
| SX240 HS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the SX240 HS and the VR-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and VR-320.
Clearly, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The younger SX240 HS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX240 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
has manual focus
supports face detection focusing
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
MP count good (14 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography information
Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (224g)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography details
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography details
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking autofocus
low fps (2.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery (230 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than average in class (224g)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
not so great battery (230 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography factors
has manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
not so great battery (230 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX240 HS
Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (224 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224 grams (0.49 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $179 |