Clicky

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
44
Overall
39
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
  • Announced February 2012
  • Succeeded the Canon SX230 HS
  • Replacement is Canon SX260 HS
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty close but the SX240 HS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") have totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SX240 HS was unveiled 5 months after the GR Digital IV so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the SX240 HS scores against the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SX240 HS GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX240 HS

 GR Digital IV SX240 HS 
Screen resolution1230k461kClearer screen (+769k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SX240 HS GR Digital IV 
IntroducedFebruary 2012September 2011Same age
Manually focus More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX240 HS provides outer dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Compare the Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the SX240 HS against the GR Digital IV.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX240 HS and GR Digital IV is 91 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and GR Digital IV.

As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SX240 HS using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Canon SX240 HS will result in greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography highlights
37
you can focus manually
supports face detect autofocus
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
41
manual focus
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Street photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography advice
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (224g)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Sports photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography advice
36
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low battery pack (230 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery life (390 CIPA)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Travel photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography factors
61
lighter than competitors (224 grams)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse mode
low battery pack (230 shots)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
67
good battery life (390 CIPA)
flash built-in
good max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography information
41
you can focus manually
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
low battery pack (230 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
53
manual focus
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (390 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Vlogging advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging advice
34
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (224 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone port
29
good max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX240 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Canon PowerShot SX240 HSRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Company Canon Ricoh
Model Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2012-02-07 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 5 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/1.9
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 461k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech PureColor II TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 1 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 224g (0.49 lb) 190g (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 photos 390 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-6L DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $0 $599