Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Released February 2012
- Earlier Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Newer Model is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon SX240 HS versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is relatively similar but the SX240 HS (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

The SX240 HS was released 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX240 HS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SX240 HS grades versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
SX240 HS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | Fresher by 28 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Canon SX240 HS
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | SX240 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
SX240 HS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX240 HS comes with physical measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX240 HS versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SX240 HS against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX240 HS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 91 and 77 respectively.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The photograph below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The SX240 HS offers the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field tougher. The more recent SX240 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-02-07 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 5 | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 180 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 images | 320 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $566 |