Clicky

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
44
Overall
39
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2012
  • Older Model is Canon SX230 HS
  • Renewed by Canon SX260 HS
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Announced February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Canon SX240 HS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the SX240 HS (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The SX240 HS was launched at a similar time to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX240 HS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX240 HS grades vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 SX240 HS GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Canon SX240 HS

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 SX240 HS 
Display resolution920k461kClearer display (+459k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 SX240 HS GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012February 2012Similar generation
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS comes with exterior measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has proportions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Check the Canon SX240 HS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the SX240 HS against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX240 HS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 91 and 69 respectively.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The pic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX240 HS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

All in all, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SX240 HS due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography advice
37
you can focus manually
includes face detect autofocus
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
74
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
exports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Street photography advice
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography advice
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (224g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
55
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than others in class (550g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Sports photography information
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography information
36
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (230 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
48
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Travel photography details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography details
61
lighter than competitors in class (224g)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
no Time Lapse function
not so great battery (230 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
59
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
more heavy than others in class (550 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX240 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Landscape photography camera
41
you can focus manually
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
not so great battery (230 CIPA)
no Time Lapse function
63
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX240 HS Vlogging info
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging info
34
fairly wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (224 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no mic socket
24
pretty wide (24mm)
comes with face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (550g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX240 HS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Canon PowerShot SX240 HSRicoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Ricoh
Model type Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2012-02-07 2012-02-02
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 5 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 461k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech PureColor II TFT LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds 180 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 224g (0.49 pounds) 550g (1.21 pounds)
Physical dimensions 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 shots 400 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-6L DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $0 $871