Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Replaced the Canon SX230 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Canon SX240 HS versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX240 HS was released 3 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SX240 HS matches up versus the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SX240 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 115k | Crisper screen (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon SX240 HS
| WG-M1 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 | February 2012 | Fresher by 31 months |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Ricoh WG-M1
| SX240 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX240 HS provides exterior measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX240 HS versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SX240 HS vs the WG-M1.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specifications. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and WG-M1.
To sum up, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to show extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older SX240 HS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $2,000 |