Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung ST100
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
95 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched February 2012
- Previous Model is Canon SX230 HS
- New Model is Canon SX260 HS
Samsung ST100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung ST100 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Canon SX240 HS and Samsung ST100, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX240 HS was unveiled 2 years later than the ST100 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Canon SX240 HS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SX240 HS grades versus the ST100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Samsung ST100. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Samsung ST100
| SX240 HS | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Canon SX240 HS
| ST100 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Samsung ST100
| SX240 HS | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX240 HS provides physical dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST100 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX240 HS and Samsung ST100 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SX240 HS compared to the ST100.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and ST100 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The graphic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and ST100.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung ST100 to offer extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The newer SX240 HS provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST100 as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
supports face detect autofocus
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
features face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography features
Samsung ST100 Street photography features
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (224 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch to focus
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than average (155g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography info
Samsung ST100 Sports photography info
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery pack (230 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST100 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition in class (224 grams)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low battery pack (230 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
comes with touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than average (155g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography advice
Samsung ST100 Landscape photography advice
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
low battery pack (230 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
lovely big screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
no manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging advice
Samsung ST100 Vlogging advice
relatively wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (224g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic port
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone jack
more heavy than average (155 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Samsung ST100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $250 |
