Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung WB250F
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched February 2012
- Old Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Newer Model is Canon SX260 HS
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Canon SX240 HS and Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is relatively close and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX240 HS was released 11 months prior to the WB250F which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SX240 HS scores vs the WB250F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Samsung WB250F
| SX240 HS | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Canon SX240 HS
| WB250F | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 11 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Samsung WB250F
| SX240 HS | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS features physical dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX240 HS and Samsung WB250F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX240 HS against the WB250F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and WB250F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The image here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX240 HS and WB250F.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB250F to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged SX240 HS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB250F Portrait photography factors
manual focus
supports face detect focus
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography highlights
Samsung WB250F Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (224g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (226g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX240 HS
Sports photography with Samsung WB250F
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
max frames per second low (2.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery (230 shots)
does not have phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14MP)
offers tracking focus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition (224g)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
bad battery (230 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than others in class (226g)
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (432mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography info
Samsung WB250F Landscape photography info
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
bad battery (230 shots)
lack of Time Lapse recording
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging factors
Samsung WB250F Vlogging factors
reasonably wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (224g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of mic port
relatively wide (24mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (226 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX240 HS vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $0 | $250 |
