Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a70d/9a70daa5e19eaa038ef747e5f40274a4f27f1719" alt="Canon PowerShot SX240 HS front Canon PowerShot SX240 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a8dd/4a8dd561f31a1ef05032a3f55300768a5c6ad484" alt="Sony Alpha a3500 front Sony Alpha a3500 front"
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Older Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Announced March 2014
- Superseded the Sony A3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Canon SX240 HS versus Sony a3500, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Canon and Sony. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the SX240 HS (1/2.3") and a3500 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SX240 HS was launched 3 years before the a3500 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX240 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the SX240 HS grades vs the a3500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Sony Alpha a3500. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Sony a3500
SX240 HS | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Canon SX240 HS
a3500 | SX240 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | Newer by 25 months |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Sony a3500
SX240 HS | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS provides exterior dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony a3500 has proportions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
See the Canon SX240 HS versus Sony a3500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the SX240 HS and the a3500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2723/c27233a567f8617b837fd204e58f3591e5d302bd" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 size comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and a3500 is 91 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1c94/b1c940f4ccb0a929ce92723371bed9b99de6d918" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The image underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and a3500.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX240 HS due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Sony a3500 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged SX240 HS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/066c2/066c237df3eac24798f8a3bd898ec0cca27971bb" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36bca/36bca9e75fb7555742d60cc64014802ca8ea953b" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Sony |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2014-03-21 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5456 x 3632 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 lbs) | 411g (0.91 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 shots | 470 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $398 |