Canon SX240 HS vs Sony S2100
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
93 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
93 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Old Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX260 HS
Sony S2100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX240 HS vs Sony S2100 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Canon SX240 HS and Sony S2100, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Sony. The resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the S2100 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX240 HS was launched 2 years after the S2100 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the SX240 HS scores vs the S2100 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX240 HS vs Sony S2100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Sony S2100
| SX240 HS | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Canon SX240 HS
| S2100 | SX240 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Sony S2100
| SX240 HS | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and size. The Canon SX240 HS enjoys physical dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony S2100 has specifications of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX240 HS and Sony S2100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX240 HS vs the S2100.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and S2100 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX240 HS and S2100.
Clearly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP so you can expect comparable quality of images though you would want to take the age of the cameras into account. The more modern SX240 HS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography advice
Sony S2100 Portrait photography advice
manual focus
features face detection focus
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX240 HS
Street photography with Sony S2100
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (224g)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography features
Sony S2100 Sports photography features
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (230 shots)
lack of phase detect auto focus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200s)
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Travel photography info
Sony S2100 Travel photography info
lighter than average in class (224g)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
bad battery power (230 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Sony S2100 as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery power (230 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen size is decent (3 inches)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX240 HS
Vlogging with Sony S2100
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (224 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone socket
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have mic jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony S2100 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $0 |
