Canon SX240 HS vs Sony T90
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
96 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony T90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched February 2012
- Replaced the Canon SX230 HS
- New Model is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
- Launched February 2009
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon SX240 HS vs Sony T90 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Canon SX240 HS vs Sony T90, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Canon and Sony. The resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the T90 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX240 HS was released 3 years after the T90 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon SX240 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony T90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SX240 HS matches up vs the T90 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon SX240 HS vs Sony T90 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Sony T90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Sony T90
| SX240 HS | T90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 | February 2009 | More modern by 37 months | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T90 over the Canon SX240 HS
| T90 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Sony T90
| SX240 HS | T90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony T90 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Canon SX240 HS has got physical dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony T90 has sizing of 94mm x 57mm x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX240 HS vs Sony T90 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the SX240 HS against the T90.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and T90 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony T90 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The pic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and T90.
As you have seen, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP so you should expect similar quality of pictures though you may want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern SX240 HS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony T90 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony T90 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) | 148 gr (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $259 |