Canon SX240 HS vs Sony W650
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony W650 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Released February 2012
- Superseded the Canon SX230 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX260 HS
Sony W650
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX240 HS vs Sony W650 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Canon SX240 HS vs Sony W650, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and W650 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX240 HS was released around the same time to the W650 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SX240 HS matches up vs the W650 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX240 HS vs Sony W650 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Sony W650
| SX240 HS | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Canon SX240 HS
| W650 | SX240 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Sony W650
| SX240 HS | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | January 2012 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX240 HS enjoys exterior dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony W650 has dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX240 HS vs Sony W650 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the SX240 HS and the W650.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and W650 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by reading specifications. The graphic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and W650.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony W650 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography information
Sony W650 Portrait photography information
you can focus manually
has face detection focus
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography highlights
Sony W650 Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (224g)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (124 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography information
Sony W650 Sports photography information
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (230 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Travel photography camera
Sony W650 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition (224 grams)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (230 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than average (124g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX240 HS
Landscape photography with Sony W650
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
terrible battery pack (230 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging info
Sony W650 Vlogging info
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (224 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no external microphone jack
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than average (124g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX240 HS vs Sony W650 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | 124g (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photos | 220 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $140 |