Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef032/ef032d14493ec5f29cac2b1dbc72c6116f24aa80" alt="Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22679/226798dc2169a13f9c95c42c23e66e6087c13ce4" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z950 front Kodak EasyShare Z950 front"
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Released June 2012
- Old Model is Canon SX240 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the SX260 HS (12MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SX260 HS was announced 24 months later than the Z950 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SX260 HS grades vs the Z950 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX260 HS & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX260 HS Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Kodak Z950
SX260 HS | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 24 months |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Canon SX260 HS
Z950 | SX260 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Kodak Z950
SX260 HS | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX260 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Kodak Z950 has dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the SX260 HS versus the Z950.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07309/07309db4428ad962f209139bd9343801eb1c8eba" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 size comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SX260 HS and Z950 is 91 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba9ce/ba9cee3c4285fec583752e513db5b0677a73ed20" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 top view buttons comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX260 HS and Z950.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP and you can expect comparable quality of photos but you will need to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The younger SX260 HS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca57f/ca57f3ae612bcc008b2f129b6b77f5959b076193" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 sensor size comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9521/b952151714b9110ab8a1c1542073d90b1189a773" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Kodak |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-06-04 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 231 grams (0.51 lb) | 243 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6L | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $349 | $250 |