Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
94 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced June 2012
- Superseded the Canon SX240 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX260 HS (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX260 HS was manufactured 7 months prior to the TG-630 iHS and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SX260 HS grades vs the TG-630 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX260 HS & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX260 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SX260 HS | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Canon SX260 HS
| TG-630 iHS | SX260 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | June 2012 | More modern by 7 months |
Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SX260 HS | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX260 HS has got physical measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the SX260 HS versus the TG-630 iHS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX260 HS and TG-630 iHS is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The picture below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX260 HS and TG-630 iHS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution and you can expect comparable quality of files however you have to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged SX260 HS will be behind in sensor technology.
Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-06-04 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 231g (0.51 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $349 | $200 |