Clicky

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
44
Overall
39
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
  • Introduced June 2012
  • Superseded the Canon SX240 HS
  • Renewed by Canon SX270 HS
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

In this article, we will be analyzing the Canon SX260 HS versus Olympus VR-340, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the SX260 HS (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The SX260 HS was manufactured 5 months later than the VR-340 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SX260 HS scores vs the VR-340 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Olympus VR-340

 SX260 HS VR-340 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen resolution461k460kSharper screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Canon SX260 HS

 VR-340 SX260 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Olympus VR-340

 SX260 HS VR-340 
IntroducedJune 2012January 2012Same generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX260 HS enjoys exterior dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

See the Canon SX260 HS versus Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the SX260 HS and the VR-340.

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SX260 HS and VR-340 is 91 and 96 respectively.

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SX260 HS and VR-340.

As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus VR-340 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively.

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX260 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Portrait photography camera
37
focusing manually
features face detection focusing
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
34
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon SX260 HS as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Street photography camera
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (231g)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon SX260 HS as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Sports photography camera
36
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery power (230 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon SX260 HS
Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
61
lighter than competition (231 grams)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse mode
low battery power (230 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
decent MP (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography factors
41
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
low battery power (230 shots)
no Timelapse mode
43
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Vlogging information
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging information
34
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (231g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone socket
33
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (125g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX260 HS and Olympus VR-340
 Canon PowerShot SX260 HSOlympus VR-340
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Olympus VR-340
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-06-04 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 5 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/3.0-5.7
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 461k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology PureColor II TFT LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 2.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 231 gr (0.51 lbs) 125 gr (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-6L LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $349 $130