Clicky

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
44
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
47
Overall
39

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
  • Introduced June 2012
  • Succeeded the Canon SX240 HS
  • Renewed by Canon SX270 HS
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Photography Glossary

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

The following is a in-depth analysis of the Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the SX260 HS (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively close but the SX260 HS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SX260 HS was introduced 9 months after the GR Digital IV so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SX260 HS grades against the GR Digital IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SX260 HS GR Digital IV 
RevealedJune 2012September 2011Newer by 9 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX260 HS

 GR Digital IV SX260 HS 
Screen resolution1230k461kSharper screen (+769k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SX260 HS GR Digital IV 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Canon SX260 HS enjoys outside measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Compare the Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the SX260 HS compared to the GR Digital IV.

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX260 HS and GR Digital IV is 91 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The pic underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX260 HS and GR Digital IV.

To sum up, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX260 HS with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Canon SX260 HS will render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The newer SX260 HS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Portrait photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography details
37
you can focus manually
provides face detection focusing
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
40
you can focus manually
exports RAW formats
resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Canon SX260 HS as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Street photography camera
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (231 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
64
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon SX260 HS
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
36
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery (230 CIPA)
does not have phase detect AF
33
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery power (390 shots)
fixed focal length (28mm)
resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon SX260 HS
Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
61
lighter than competition (231 grams)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (230 per charge)
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
67
good battery power (390 per charge)
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
resolution not great (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography highlights
41
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
not so great battery (230 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse recording
52
you can focus manually
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (390 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX260 HS as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
34
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (231 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic socket
29
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon SX260 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX260 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Canon PowerShot SX260 HSRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Ricoh
Model type Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-06-04 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 5 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/1.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 461 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology PureColor II TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 1 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 231 grams (0.51 pounds) 190 grams (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 pictures 390 pictures
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-6L DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $349 $599