Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef032/ef032d14493ec5f29cac2b1dbc72c6116f24aa80" alt="Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bfe6/8bfe6a95e0404efc2daeb5daa70aaa6f63f8ea78" alt="Samsung CL80 front Samsung CL80 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed June 2012
- Old Model is Canon SX240 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SX260 HS (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SX260 HS was released 2 years later than the CL80 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX260 HS being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SX260 HS scores against the CL80 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX260 HS and Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX260 HS Gallery and Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Samsung CL80
SX260 HS | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 30 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Canon SX260 HS
CL80 | SX260 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Samsung CL80
SX260 HS | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX260 HS enjoys outside measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the SX260 HS vs the CL80.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36fa0/36fa0a7a5812ae63330960e3a6a3fa511c646106" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 size comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX260 HS and CL80 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74063/74063669030165a24863dc305405ee961eaca6e1" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX260 HS and CL80.
Clearly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung CL80 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent SX260 HS will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33237/33237752b68e98eb953904d79e7e3e0c79b15b1e" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fde3b/fde3bdd475c4fb2fcaba00e49dadb2b70629360b" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Samsung CL80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Samsung CL80 |
Otherwise known as | - | ST5500 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-06-04 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 231 gr (0.51 lbs) | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6L | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $349 | $400 |