Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef032/ef032d14493ec5f29cac2b1dbc72c6116f24aa80" alt="Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4f52/d4f52e39beb092353224512dc646b19cc509cfae" alt="Samsung HZ50W front Samsung HZ50W front"
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Released June 2012
- Replaced the Canon SX240 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Also Known as WB5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Canon SX260 HS and Samsung HZ50W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the SX260 HS (12MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SX260 HS was unveiled 2 years later than the HZ50W and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX260 HS being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SX260 HS matches up versus the HZ50W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX260 HS & Samsung HZ50W. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX260 HS Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Samsung HZ50W
SX260 HS | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2012 | ![]() | May 2010 | Fresher by 26 months |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Canon SX260 HS
HZ50W | SX260 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Samsung HZ50W
SX260 HS | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX260 HS has physical measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX260 HS and Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the SX260 HS compared to the HZ50W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65943/65943cd7d821d6d4e21912230f24e9fafd9d0055" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX260 HS and HZ50W is 91 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04cd/f04cd3fac5131ccb9e390d110a1c92a2d4939421" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX260 HS and HZ50W.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung HZ50W to render more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern SX260 HS will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9368/c93687b4be42ba4e2ddf45445a827cfcd66dbbad" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison"
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe72d/fe72d0de11355cfe997accf8be852dc390182f17" alt="Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Samsung |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Samsung HZ50W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB5500 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-06-04 | 2010-05-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 231 grams (0.51 lbs) | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6L | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $349 | $250 |