Clicky

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
44
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
48
Features
45
Overall
46

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
  • Revealed June 2012
  • Old Model is Canon SX240 HS
  • Replacement is Canon SX270 HS
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Launched January 2008
  • New Model is Sony A330
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300 Overview

In this article, we are looking at the Canon SX260 HS versus Sony A300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Canon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SX260 HS (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the SX260 HS (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SX260 HS was launched 4 years after the A300 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX260 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SX260 HS grades against the A300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Sony A300

 SX260 HS A300 
LaunchedJune 2012January 2008More modern by 53 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kCrisper display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Canon SX260 HS

 A300 SX260 HS 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Sony A300

 SX260 HS A300 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX260 HS has got outside measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon SX260 HS versus Sony A300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SX260 HS versus the A300.

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX260 HS and A300 is 91 and 64 respectively.

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing a spec sheet. The image below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX260 HS and A300.

As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SX260 HS due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Canon SX260 HS will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The younger SX260 HS should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Portrait photography highlights
Sony A300 Portrait photography highlights
37
you can focus manually
features face detection focusing
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
58
manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
low megapixels (10MP)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon SX260 HS
Street photography with Sony A300
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (231 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
74
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon SX260 HS as a Sports photography camera
Sony A300 as a Sports photography camera
36
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (230 shots)
has no phase detect AF
54
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Travel photography information
Sony A300 Travel photography information
61
lighter than competitors in class (231 grams)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (230 per charge)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
45
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Landscape photography information
Sony A300 Landscape photography information
41
you can focus manually
fairly wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
bad battery power (230 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
56
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (10MP)
no Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Vlogging features
Sony A300 Vlogging features
34
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (231 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic socket
9
lack of video recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX260 HS vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX260 HS and Sony A300
 Canon PowerShot SX260 HSSony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Brand Name Canon Sony
Model Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2012-06-04 2008-01-30
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 5 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.5-6.8 -
Macro focus range 5cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech PureColor II TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/3200s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 231 gr (0.51 lb) 632 gr (1.39 lb)
Dimensions 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life 230 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-6L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $349 $0