Canon SX260 HS vs Sony W800
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
96 Imaging
44 Features
29 Overall
38
96 Imaging
44 Features
29 Overall
38
Canon SX260 HS vs Sony W800 Key Specs
Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced June 2012
- Previous Model is Canon SX240 HS
- Newer Model is Canon SX270 HS
Sony W800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.2-6.4) lens
- 125g - 97 x 55 x 21mm
- Launched February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX260 HS vs Sony W800 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Canon SX260 HS vs Sony W800, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the SX260 HS (12MP) and W800 (20MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX260 HS was announced 20 months prior to the W800 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SX260 HS grades vs the W800 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX260 HS vs Sony W800 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX260 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX260 HS Gallery & Sony W800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Sony W800
| SX260 HS | W800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W800 over the Canon SX260 HS
| W800 | SX260 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | June 2012 | More modern by 20 months |
Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Sony W800
| SX260 HS | W800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon SX260 HS vs Sony W800 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX260 HS features exterior measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony W800 has proportions of 97mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Canon SX260 HS vs Sony W800 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SX260 HS compared to the W800.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SX260 HS and W800 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX260 HS vs Sony W800 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The picture below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX260 HS and W800.
To sum up, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Sony W800 to provide you with more detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged SX260 HS will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX260 HS vs Sony W800 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX260 HS Portrait photography features
Sony W800 Portrait photography features
focusing manually
provides face detect autofocus
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
MP count decent (20MP)
offers face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX260 HS
Street photography with Sony W800
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (231g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX260 HS
Sports photography with Sony W800
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking focus
max frames per second low (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery power (230 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Canon SX260 HS Travel photography details
Sony W800 Travel photography details
lighter than competition in class (231g)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
low battery power (230 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (125g)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Canon SX260 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W800 as a Landscape photography camera
focusing manually
quite wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
low battery power (230 shots)
does not have Timelapse recording
really wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX260 HS as a Vlogging camera
Sony W800 as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (231 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone support
really wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX260 HS vs Sony W800 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-06-04 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.2-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | AVI MPEG4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 231 gr (0.51 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 97 x 55 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $349 | $90 |