Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-H20G
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-H20G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Launched March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-H20G Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-H20G, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Casio. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the EX-H20G (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX270 HS was revealed 2 years later than the EX-H20G and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SX270 HS grades against the EX-H20G with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-H20G Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Casio Exilim EX-H20G. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Casio EX-H20G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Casio EX-H20G
| SX270 HS | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Canon SX270 HS
| EX-H20G | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Casio EX-H20G
| SX270 HS | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 461k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-H20G Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX270 HS has got outer measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Casio EX-H20G has measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-H20G in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the SX270 HS vs the EX-H20G.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and EX-H20G is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-H20G Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and EX-H20G.
All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to give you greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer SX270 HS is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-H20G Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-H20G Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Casio Exilim EX-H20G |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-03-21 | 2010-09-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 6 | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 pounds) | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $284 | $300 |