Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6a3e/d6a3ec714ec0a4b69aa98e1d00bdd99052cb3b52" alt="Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e75f/3e75f97ec72a6b6432f81acd12a383eebb151e04" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front"
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Introduced March 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Canon and Casio. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and EX-ZR300 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SX270 HS was revealed 11 months later than the EX-ZR300 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short view of how the SX270 HS scores versus the EX-ZR300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Casio Exilim EX-ZR300. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Casio EX-ZR300
SX270 HS | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2013 | ![]() | May 2012 | Fresher by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Canon SX270 HS
EX-ZR300 | SX270 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Casio EX-ZR300
SX270 HS | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 461k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX270 HS features exterior measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZR300 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the EX-ZR300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60ecd/60ecd199b68b93f8c00f95012d0d068509073c14" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and EX-ZR300 is 91 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07aa6/07aa65ccedb4a7c0203927fe809e8214b177393a" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 top view buttons comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The graphic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and EX-ZR300.
All in all, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to result in extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher SX270 HS provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/874f5/874f5e5cfa7599fffe858ce0e747b76c1e462b54" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 sensor size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a961b/a961b04f8da08f6820e6d29bf2a65455d764151e" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-03-21 | 2012-05-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 6 | Exilim Engine HS |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 15 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photos | 500 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-6L | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $284 | $329 |