Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs
Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX280 HS
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and Casio. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and EX-ZR800 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX270 HS was unveiled 4 months prior to the EX-ZR800 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SX270 HS scores against the EX-ZR800 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Casio Exilim EX-ZR800. The full galleries are available at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Casio EX-ZR800
| SX270 HS | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Canon SX270 HS
| EX-ZR800 | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Casio EX-ZR800
| SX270 HS | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | August 2013 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX270 HS features exterior measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR800 has specifications of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the SX270 HS vs the EX-ZR800.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and EX-ZR800 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The picture here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and EX-ZR800.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer you more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Portrait photography factors
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
provides face detection autofocus
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Canon SX270 HS as a Street photography camera
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (233 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (222g)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Sports photography factors
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
slow fps (4.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery pack (210 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX270 HS
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR800
lighter than competition (233 grams)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
low battery pack (210 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
lighter than others (222g)
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
long zoom (450mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX270 HS
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR800
you can focus manually
fairly wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
low battery pack (210 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse mode
has manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX270 HS
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR800
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (233 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of external mic port
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (222 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2013-08-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 6 | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 lbs) | 222g (0.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | 470 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $284 | $429 |
