Canon SX270 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
Canon SX270 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- New Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
- Released January 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm HS30EXR
- Successor is Fujifilm HS50 EXR
Canon SX270 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Canon SX270 HS versus Fujifilm HS35EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and FujiFilm. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and Fujifilm HS35EXR (16MP) and the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm HS35EXR (1/2") possess different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe SX270 HS was introduced 3 months after the Fujifilm HS35EXR so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm HS35EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the SX270 HS grades against the Fujifilm HS35EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon SX270 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Fujifilm HS35EXR
SX270 HS | Fujifilm HS35EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS35EXR over the Canon SX270 HS
Fujifilm HS35EXR | SX270 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Fujifilm HS35EXR
SX270 HS | Fujifilm HS35EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | January 2013 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX270 HS features external dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Fujifilm HS35EXR has proportions of 131mm x 97mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 687 grams (1.51 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX270 HS versus Fujifilm HS35EXR in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the SX270 HS versus the Fujifilm HS35EXR.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and Fujifilm HS35EXR is 91 and 59 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and Fujifilm HS35EXR.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SX270 HS using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Fujifilm HS35EXR will give greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX270 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 6 | EXR |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 233g (0.51 lb) | 687g (1.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photographs | 600 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-6L | NP-W126 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $284 | $380 |