Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Z915
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Announced January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Z915, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX270 HS was revealed 4 years after the Z915 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SX270 HS matches up against the Z915 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Kodak Z915
| SX270 HS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 52 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Canon SX270 HS
| Z915 | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Kodak Z915
| SX270 HS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS has physical measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Kodak Z915 has sizing of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Z915 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the SX270 HS and the Z915.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and Z915 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and Z915.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Canon SX270 HS to deliver extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer SX270 HS should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $284 | $200 |