Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Canon SX270 HS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Canon and Kodak. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe SX270 HS was announced 9 months earlier than the Astro Zoom AZ651 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SX270 HS scores against the Astro Zoom AZ651 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
SX270 HS | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Canon SX270 HS
Astro Zoom AZ651 | SX270 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | March 2013 | More recent by 9 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
SX270 HS | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS enjoys exterior dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has sizing of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX270 HS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the Astro Zoom AZ651.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 91 and 65 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and Astro Zoom AZ651.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give more detail with its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older SX270 HS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 21MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 233g (0.51 lbs) | 567g (1.25 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $284 | $419 |