Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon W300
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Introduced March 2013
- Succeeded the Canon SX260 HS
- Successor is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
Photography Glossary Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon W300 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon W300, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Nikon. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and W300 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX270 HS was announced 5 years before the W300 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SX270 HS scores against the W300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon W300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Nikon Coolpix W300. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Nikon W300
| SX270 HS | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Canon SX270 HS
| W300 | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | March 2013 | Newer by 51 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Nikon W300
| SX270 HS | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX270 HS provides outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Nikon W300 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon W300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the W300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and W300 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The image below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and W300.
As you can tell, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon W300 to deliver greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged SX270 HS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon W300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-03-21 | 2017-05-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 pounds) | 231 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | 280 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Built-in |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $284 | $387 |