Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-4000
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Previous Model is Canon SX260 HS
- New Model is Canon SX280 HS
Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus FE-4000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the FE-4000 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX270 HS was launched 3 years after the FE-4000 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the SX270 HS grades against the FE-4000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Olympus FE-4000. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus FE-4000
| SX270 HS | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 45 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Canon SX270 HS
| FE-4000 | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus FE-4000
| SX270 HS | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX270 HS offers external measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4000 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus FE-4000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX270 HS and the FE-4000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and FE-4000 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and FE-4000.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you can expect comparable quality of files though you have to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The fresher SX270 HS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX270 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus FE-4000 as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
features face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX270 HS
Street photography with Olympus FE-4000
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (233g)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lighter than average (136 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Sports photography factors
Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low battery pack (210 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Travel photography details
Olympus FE-4000 Travel photography details
lighter than competition in class (233 grams)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low battery pack (210 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than average (136g)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Canon SX270 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus FE-4000 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
low battery pack (210 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse recording
really wide (26mm)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Vlogging info
Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging info
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (233g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have mic support
really wide (26mm)
lighter than average (136 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Also called as | - | X-925 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 6 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 lbs) | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $284 | $130 |