Clicky

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front
 
Olympus SP-590 UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
34
Features
38
Overall
35

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Key Specs

Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
  • Announced March 2013
  • Succeeded the Canon SX260 HS
  • Refreshed by Canon SX280 HS
Olympus SP-590 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Revealed January 2009
  • Renewed by Olympus SP-600 UZ
Photography Glossary

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the SP-590 UZ (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SX270 HS was manufactured 4 years later than the SP-590 UZ and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the SX270 HS matches up versus the SP-590 UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus SP-590 UZ

 SX270 HS SP-590 UZ 
RevealedMarch 2013January 2009More recent by 52 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Canon SX270 HS

 SP-590 UZ SX270 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus SP-590 UZ

 SX270 HS SP-590 UZ 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX270 HS features physical dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-590 UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Look at the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the SX270 HS against the SP-590 UZ.

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and SP-590 UZ is 91 and 72 respectively.

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SX270 HS and SP-590 UZ.

As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP and you can expect similar quality of files however you should always factor the age of the products into consideration. The more recent SX270 HS is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX270 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SP-590 UZ as a Portrait photography camera
34
manual focus
supports face detect focusing
external flash not possible
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
36
has manual focus
supports RAW formats
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon SX270 HS as a Street photography camera
Olympus SP-590 UZ as a Street photography camera
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (233 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
environment proof
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon SX270 HS as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SP-590 UZ as a Sports photography camera
36
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (210 per charge)
does not have phase detect AF
38
excellent zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
environment proof
max frames per second very slow (6.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Travel photography factors
Olympus SP-590 UZ Travel photography factors
61
lighter than others (233g)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
missing Timelapse function
terrible battery power (210 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
58
environment proof
flash built-in
reasonably wide (26mm)
great reach (676mm)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon SX270 HS
Landscape photography with Olympus SP-590 UZ
41
manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
terrible battery power (210 per charge)
missing Timelapse function
45
has manual focus
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
environment proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Vlogging info
Olympus SP-590 UZ Vlogging info
34
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (233 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
missing microphone port
24
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX270 HS and Olympus SP-590 UZ
 Canon PowerShot SX270 HSOlympus SP-590 UZ
General Information
Company Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot SX270 HS Olympus SP-590 UZ
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-03-21 2009-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Digic 6 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 26-676mm (26.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 15 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 8.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 233g (0.51 pounds) 413g (0.91 pounds)
Physical dimensions 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 pictures -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-6L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $284 $249