Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Successor is Canon SX280 HS
Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Old Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the SP-600 UZ (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX270 HS was unveiled 3 years after the SP-600 UZ which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the SX270 HS grades versus the SP-600 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The full galleries are available at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| SX270 HS | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 39 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Canon SX270 HS
| SP-600 UZ | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus SP-600 UZ
| SX270 HS | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX270 HS comes with exterior dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SP-600 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
See the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the SX270 HS versus the SP-600 UZ.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and SP-600 UZ is 91 and 69 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and SP-600 UZ.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of images although you will need to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more modern SX270 HS should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX270 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
provides face detection focus
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
you can focus manually
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Street photography highlights
Olympus SP-600 UZ Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (233g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Sports photography highlights
Olympus SP-600 UZ Sports photography highlights
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (210 per charge)
no phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (28-420mm 15.0 x zoom)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX270 HS
Travel photography with Olympus SP-600 UZ
lighter than others in class (233 grams)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
bad battery pack (210 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
great zoom (420mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Landscape photography factors
Olympus SP-600 UZ Landscape photography factors
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
bad battery pack (210 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Canon SX270 HS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (233g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic port
really wide (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic socket
Photography Glossary
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 6 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.4 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lbs) | 455 gr (1.00 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $284 | $189 |
