Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 550WP
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 550WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Also referred to as mju 550WP
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 550WP Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 550WP, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the 550WP (10MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX270 HS was unveiled 4 years after the 550WP which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX270 HS matches up against the 550WP with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 550WP Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Olympus Stylus 550WP. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Olympus 550WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus 550WP
| SX270 HS | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 52 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Canon SX270 HS
| 550WP | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus 550WP
| SX270 HS | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 550WP Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX270 HS has got external measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus 550WP has proportions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 550WP in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the SX270 HS versus the 550WP.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX270 HS and 550WP is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 550WP Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and 550WP.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Canon SX270 HS to give extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern SX270 HS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 550WP Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 550WP Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus Stylus 550WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
| Also referred to as | - | mju 550WP |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $284 | $399 |