Clicky

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
  • Introduced March 2013
  • Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
  • Renewed by Canon SX280 HS
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Also referred to as mju 9000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon SX270 HS versus Olympus 9000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SX270 HS was released 3 years after the 9000 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SX270 HS matches up versus the 9000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus 9000

 SX270 HS 9000 
LaunchedMarch 2013May 2009More modern by 47 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon SX270 HS

 9000 SX270 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus 9000

 SX270 HS 9000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX270 HS offers physical dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the Canon SX270 HS versus Olympus 9000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SX270 HS versus the 9000.

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX270 HS and 9000 is 91 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SX270 HS and 9000.

As you can see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP so you should expect similar quality of photographs though you really should take the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher SX270 HS will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX270 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus 9000
34
manual focus
comes with face detection autofocus
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
20
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Street photography features
Olympus 9000 Street photography features
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (233g)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (225g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Sports photography factors
Olympus 9000 Sports photography factors
36
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (4.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (210 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon SX270 HS
Travel photography with Olympus 9000
61
lighter than competitors (233g)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
not so great battery power (210 per charge)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
58
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (225 grams)
low MP (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Landscape photography information
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography information
41
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
not so great battery power (210 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse mode
31
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Vlogging factors
Olympus 9000 Vlogging factors
34
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (233 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone jack
27
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not have selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (225g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX270 HS and Olympus 9000
 Canon PowerShot SX270 HSOlympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot SX270 HS Olympus Stylus 9000
Also called as - mju 9000
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2013-03-21 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Digic 6 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 50
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 233 gr (0.51 lb) 225 gr (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-6L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $284 $300