Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- Successor is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX270 HS was released 3 years after the Tough-3000 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SX270 HS scores versus the Tough-3000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus Tough-3000
| SX270 HS | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 39 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Canon SX270 HS
| Tough-3000 | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus Tough-3000
| SX270 HS | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX270 HS offers exterior dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the Tough-3000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and Tough-3000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SX270 HS and Tough-3000.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of files though you really should factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger SX270 HS provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 6 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lb) | 159 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $284 | $0 |