Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 6020
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Canon SX270 HS versus Olympus 6020, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX270 HS was announced 3 years later than the 6020 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SX270 HS scores against the 6020 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus 6020
| SX270 HS | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 39 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Canon SX270 HS
| 6020 | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus 6020
| SX270 HS | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX270 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Canon SX270 HS versus Olympus 6020 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the 6020.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and 6020 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and 6020.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus 6020 to provide you with more detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern SX270 HS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 6 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 pounds) | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $284 | $279 |