Clicky

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs

Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
  • Introduced March 2013
  • Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
  • Refreshed by Canon SX280 HS
Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview

The following is a detailed overview of the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SX270 HS was manufactured 10 months earlier than the TG-850 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SX270 HS scores against the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus TG-850 iHS

 SX270 HS TG-850 iHS 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen resolution461k460kClearer screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Canon SX270 HS

 TG-850 iHS SX270 HS 
LaunchedJanuary 2014March 2013Newer by 10 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus TG-850 iHS

 SX270 HS TG-850 iHS 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Canon SX270 HS comes with exterior measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check out the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the SX270 HS and the TG-850 iHS.

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and TG-850 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing technical specs. The pic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and TG-850 iHS.

As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-850 iHS to deliver more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged SX270 HS is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX270 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
34
has manual focus
features face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
34
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-850 iHS Street photography highlights
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (233g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
69
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
weather proofing
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Sports photography features
Olympus TG-850 iHS Sports photography features
36
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (210 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
50
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
better than average battery life (330 CIPA)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon SX270 HS
Travel photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
61
lighter than competition in class (233 grams)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (210 shots)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
72
better than average battery life (330 per charge)
weather proofing
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (21mm)
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-850 iHS Landscape photography features
41
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
bad battery life (210 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse mode
49
quite wide (21mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
better than average battery life (330 per charge)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-850 iHS Vlogging factors
34
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (233g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic support
33
quite wide (21mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX270 HS and Olympus TG-850 iHS
 Canon PowerShot SX270 HSOlympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot SX270 HS Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Introduced 2013-03-21 2014-01-29
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 6 TruePic VII
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4616 x 3464
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 21-105mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/3.5-5.7
Macro focus range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 461k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 1/2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s 7.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 233 grams (0.51 pounds) 218 grams (0.48 pounds)
Dimensions 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 images 330 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-6L LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval))
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $284 $250