Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Succeeded the Canon SX260 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX280 HS
Olympus TG-1 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Canon SX270 HS versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX270 HS was introduced 11 months after the TG-1 iHS and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SX270 HS matches up against the TG-1 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SX270 HS | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | May 2012 | More modern by 11 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Canon SX270 HS
| TG-1 iHS | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+149k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SX270 HS | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS offers outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has sizing of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX270 HS versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the SX270 HS vs the TG-1 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX270 HS and TG-1 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX270 HS and TG-1 iHS.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you should expect similar quality of pictures but you would want to take the release date of the products into consideration. The more modern SX270 HS should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-1 iHS Portrait photography details
focusing manually
includes face detect focusing
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
comes with face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Street photography factors
Olympus TG-1 iHS Street photography factors
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (233g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Sports photography details
Olympus TG-1 iHS Sports photography details
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
max frames per second low (4.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low battery life (210 per charge)
does not have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
better than average battery (350 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Travel photography details
Olympus TG-1 iHS Travel photography details
lighter than competition in class (233g)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
low battery life (210 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery (350 per charge)
weather sealing
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
missing Timelapse function
low resolution (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-1 iHS Landscape photography info
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
low battery life (210 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse recording
relatively wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
better than average battery (350 CIPA)
no manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
low resolution (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Vlogging information
Olympus TG-1 iHS Vlogging information
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (233g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone port
relatively wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone port
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $284 | $399 |
