Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus VH-515
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX260 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus VH-515, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the VH-515 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX270 HS was announced 8 months after the VH-515 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX270 HS scores vs the VH-515 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Olympus VH-515. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus VH-515
| SX270 HS | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 | August 2012 | Newer by 8 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Canon SX270 HS
| VH-515 | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus VH-515
| SX270 HS | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS provides exterior measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus VH-515 has sizing of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus VH-515 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SX270 HS versus the VH-515.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and VH-515 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The image below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and VH-515.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP so you should expect similar quality of images but you will want to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern SX270 HS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus VH-515 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 6 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 pounds) | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $284 | $648 |