Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Launched March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is fairly close but the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") posses different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX270 HS was launched 19 months after the GR Digital IV making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SX270 HS scores against the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX270 HS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | September 2011 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX270 HS
GR Digital IV | SX270 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 461k | Crisper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX270 HS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS offers external measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the GR Digital IV.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and GR Digital IV is 91 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and GR Digital IV.
All in all, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX270 HS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Canon SX270 HS will render more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern SX270 HS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-03-21 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 pictures | 390 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-6L | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $284 | $599 |