Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6a3e/d6a3ec714ec0a4b69aa98e1d00bdd99052cb3b52" alt="Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b2c4/4b2c48a59424bf7e9398646eaf9b305a09be3d25" alt="Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- New Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Canon SX270 HS and Ricoh WG-30, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SX270 HS was introduced 18 months prior to the WG-30 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX270 HS matches up vs the WG-30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Ricoh WG-30. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Ricoh WG-30
SX270 HS | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Canon SX270 HS
WG-30 | SX270 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2014 | ![]() | March 2013 | Fresher by 18 months |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Ricoh WG-30
SX270 HS | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS enjoys physical dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX270 HS and Ricoh WG-30 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the SX270 HS and the WG-30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99b40/99b4020bfc21f856d787a0fb9e78b8cd46a935bb" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SX270 HS and WG-30 is 91 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27f66/27f66fa0eb26cae35e27753af3c31e9db69d9e67" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and WG-30.
Clearly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-30 to offer you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older SX270 HS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a25a3/a25a365cb51a73e170efe172a3ae51a2dfa9b5cd" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4317c/4317c50fe8d30ddc7be7ead516b992aa7a0c2df3" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Ricoh WG-30 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 233g (0.51 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | 300 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6L | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $284 | $428 |