Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Launched March 2013
- Succeeded the Canon SX260 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Canon SX270 HS versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX270 HS was manufactured 18 months before the WG-M1 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SX270 HS matches up versus the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SX270 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon SX270 HS
| WG-M1 | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | March 2013 | Newer by 18 months |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Ricoh WG-M1
| SX270 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS has external measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Canon SX270 HS versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX270 HS and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The image below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to show extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged SX270 HS will be behind in sensor tech.
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-03-21 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $284 | $2,000 |