Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST65
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Previous Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Newer Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Canon SX270 HS and Samsung ST65, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX270 HS was revealed 2 years after the ST65 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SX270 HS scores vs the ST65 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Samsung ST65. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Samsung ST65
| SX270 HS | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 27 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Canon SX270 HS
| ST65 | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Samsung ST65
| SX270 HS | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Canon SX270 HS features physical measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Canon SX270 HS and Samsung ST65 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the SX270 HS and the ST65.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and ST65 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The picture below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and ST65.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung ST65 to give more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher SX270 HS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Samsung ST65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $284 | $130 |