Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST93
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38


97 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX260 HS
- New Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched April 2011

Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Canon SX270 HS versus Samsung ST93, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Canon and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and ST93 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The SX270 HS was manufactured 24 months later than the ST93 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SX270 HS grades versus the ST93 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Samsung ST93. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Samsung ST93
SX270 HS | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2013 | ![]() | April 2011 | More recent by 24 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Canon SX270 HS
ST93 | SX270 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Samsung ST93
SX270 HS | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS has got exterior measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung ST93 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX270 HS versus Samsung ST93 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the SX270 HS vs the ST93.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and ST93 is 91 and 97 respectively.

Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The visual below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and ST93.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung ST93 to produce extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The younger SX270 HS will have an edge in sensor tech.

Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Samsung ST93 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Samsung |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Samsung ST93 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2011-04-20 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 233g (0.51 pounds) | 110g (0.24 pounds) |
Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $284 | - |