Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
![Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-SX270-HS/Canon-SX270-HS-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-WB800F.jpg)
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Previous Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Updated by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The SX270 HS was unveiled 3 months after the WB800F and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the SX270 HS grades versus the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Samsung WB800F
SX270 HS | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Canon SX270 HS
WB800F | SX270 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Samsung WB800F
SX270 HS | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX270 HS features exterior measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the WB800F.
![Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX270-HS-vs-Samsung-WB800F-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.
![Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX270-HS-vs-Samsung-WB800F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The pic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and WB800F.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung WB800F to result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively.
![Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX270-HS-vs-Samsung-WB800F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX270-HS-vs-Samsung-WB800F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-03-21 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 233 grams (0.51 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $284 | $300 |