Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38


70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- Updated by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Launched February 2014

Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.

The SX270 HS was introduced 10 months earlier than the DP2 Quattro so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SX270 HS scores versus the DP2 Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
SX270 HS | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Canon SX270 HS
DP2 Quattro | SX270 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | March 2013 | More recent by 10 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Sigma DP2 Quattro
SX270 HS | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon SX270 HS offers outside dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the SX270 HS and the DP2 Quattro.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX270 HS and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.

Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and DP2 Quattro.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SX270 HS using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve greater detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older SX270 HS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Sigma |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 6 | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 233 gr (0.51 pounds) | 395 gr (0.87 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6L | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $284 | $931 |