Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6a3e/d6a3ec714ec0a4b69aa98e1d00bdd99052cb3b52" alt="Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/696e8/696e8b342790bcee8506262570e31de4472938f0" alt="Sigma SD15 front Sigma SD15 front"
59 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Released February 2010
- Earlier Model is Sigma SD14
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Canon SX270 HS and Sigma SD15, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Canon and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and SD15 (5MP) and the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and SD15 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SX270 HS was revealed 3 years later than the SD15 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD15 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SX270 HS scores versus the SD15 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Sigma SD15. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Sigma SD15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Sigma SD15
SX270 HS | SD15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 38 months |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD15 over the Canon SX270 HS
SD15 | SX270 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Sigma SD15
SX270 HS | SD15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX270 HS features outer measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sigma SD15 has measurements of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX270 HS and Sigma SD15 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the SD15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d40fe/d40fe8557717b1bc1036d8779ce160ac0aab13cb" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and SD15 is 91 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33578/3357843c2d716ef34c6a274c813b06749265364f" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 top view buttons comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specifications. The graphic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and SD15.
To sum up, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SX270 HS having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Canon SX270 HS will render extra detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger SX270 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e484/2e484f31e2fa0fa2f04b874e76b04a27192fc346" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 sensor size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ee51/1ee51504dfc6d856afeb6853f487dc2d3c0a13c6" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD15 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sigma SD15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Sigma |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sigma SD15 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2013-03-21 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 6 | True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2640 x 1760 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 233 grams (0.51 lbs) | 750 grams (1.65 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $284 | $1,500 |