Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6a3e/d6a3ec714ec0a4b69aa98e1d00bdd99052cb3b52" alt="Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d2fe/1d2fed2caf199c62565b698420d940e61084850d" alt="Sigma fp front Sigma fp front"
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Launched March 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX260 HS
- New Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced July 2019
- Later Model is Sigma fp L
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Canon and Sigma. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and fp (25MP) and the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SX270 HS was announced 7 years before the fp and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SX270 HS grades vs the fp for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Sigma fp. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Sigma fp
SX270 HS | fp |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Canon SX270 HS
fp | SX270 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2019 | ![]() | March 2013 | Fresher by 76 months |
Screen size | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper screen (+1639k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Sigma fp
SX270 HS | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS enjoys outside dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sigma fp has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SX270 HS vs the fp.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc76a/fc76a2eec3553bf7abfada0f1400cc6141f35a34" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and fp is 91 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d86eb/d86ebfe8d2a301a9e0536950047a1399c847adc3" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and fp.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SX270 HS using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma fp will offer you more detail with its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older SX270 HS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a45dd/a45ddef5fea5e57c02b89d6029e8e8b226231764" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba01a/ba01ae609e29707bd5bca1366c2a958921072534" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma fp Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Sigma |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sigma fp |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-03-21 | 2019-07-11 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 25MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Leica L |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 30 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.2" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 2,100 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 233g (0.51 lb) | 422g (0.93 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6L | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $284 | $2,050 |