Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX300
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Introduced March 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Released February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony HX200V
- Refreshed by Sony HX400V
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX300 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX270 HS was launched at a similar time to the HX300 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SX270 HS matches up vs the HX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Sony HX300
| SX270 HS | HX300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Canon SX270 HS
| HX300 | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 461k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Sony HX300
| SX270 HS | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 | February 2013 | Similar age | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX270 HS provides outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has specifications of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
See the Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the SX270 HS versus the HX300.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and HX300 is 91 and 63 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The picture below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and HX300.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony HX300 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-03-21 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 lb) | 623g (1.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $284 | $339 |