Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX400V
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX280 HS
Sony HX400V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Older Model is Sony HX300
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX400V Overview
Its time to look closer at the Canon SX270 HS and Sony HX400V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and HX400V (20MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX270 HS was revealed 10 months prior to the HX400V and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SX270 HS scores versus the HX400V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX400V Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Sony HX400V
| SX270 HS | HX400V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Canon SX270 HS
| HX400V | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | March 2013 | Fresher by 10 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Sony HX400V
| SX270 HS | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX270 HS has physical measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony HX400V has measurements of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX270 HS and Sony HX400V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the HX400V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and HX400V is 91 and 62 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through specs. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and HX400V.
All in all, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony HX400V to show more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older SX270 HS will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX270 HS
Portrait photography with Sony HX400V
has manual focus
supports face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Street photography features
Sony HX400V Street photography features
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (233 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition (660 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Sports photography highlights
Sony HX400V Sports photography highlights
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
slow fps (4.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low battery life (210 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Travel photography highlights
Sony HX400V Travel photography highlights
lighter than others in class (233g)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low battery life (210 shots)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (660 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Canon SX270 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Sony HX400V as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
low battery life (210 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX270 HS
Vlogging with Sony HX400V
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (233g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone port
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with microphone port
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competition (660g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony HX400V Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 lb) | 660g (1.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | 300 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $284 | $448 |