Canon SX270 HS vs Sony TX1
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX260 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced August 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX270 HS vs Sony TX1 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Canon SX270 HS vs Sony TX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Sony. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the TX1 (10MP) is fairly close but the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") use totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX270 HS was launched 3 years after the TX1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the SX270 HS matches up vs the TX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX270 HS vs Sony TX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Sony TX1
| SX270 HS | TX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 | August 2009 | Newer by 45 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Canon SX270 HS
| TX1 | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Sony TX1
| SX270 HS | TX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX270 HS features external measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony TX1 has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX270 HS vs Sony TX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the SX270 HS against the TX1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and TX1 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The picture below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and TX1.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX270 HS because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Canon SX270 HS will render more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher SX270 HS will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony TX1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2009-08-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 lb) | 142g (0.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $284 | $350 |